Which of these is an action that QCAT can take against a health practitioner?

QCAT, which stands for the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal, has specific powers concerning the regulation of health practitioners. One of the actions it can take is to provide counseling or impose conditions on a health practitioner's practice. This is often aimed at ensuring that the practitioner meets necessary professional standards and addresses any issues that may affect their ability to provide safe and effective care to patients. Such measures are generally remedial in nature, focusing on improving the practitioner's conduct and skillset rather than merely penalizing them.

In contrast, regulatory funding for training is not typically an action that QCAT itself handles, as it does not manage funding or financial grants. The imposition of a fine exceeding $30,000 is also outside of QCAT's jurisdiction; the tribunal typically does not impose such large financial penalties. Additionally, issuing a guarantee of practice competency is not within QCAT's remit, as this would involve a formal assurance that a practitioner is competent, rather than a consequence or remedy for their conduct or performance issues.

Thus, the option that aligns with QCAT’s role and authority concerning health practitioners is the provision of counseling or the imposition of conditions aimed at enhancing practice standards.